Maxwell
Center for Environmental Policy and Administration

Policy vs. Consumer Pressure: Innovation and Diffusion of Alternative Bleaching Technologies in the Pulp Industry

Author:David Popp with Tamara Hafner
Date: 2008
Publication:Environmental Policy, Technological Innovation, and Patents, Nick Johnstone and Ivan Hascic eds., OECD, Paris, 107-138 (also appears as Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Environmental Directorate report #ENV/EPOC/WPNEP(2007)3)
Link:http://www.nber.org/papers/w13439

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, concern over dioxin in both paper products and wastewater led to the development of techniques that reduced the use of chlorine in the pulp industry. Both regulatory and consumer pressure motivated this change. We use patent data to examine the evolution of two completing bleaching technologies in five major paper-producing countries, both of which reduce the use of chlorine in the pulping process. By the end of the 1990s, nearly all pulp production in these countries used one of these technologies. Unlike other papers using patents to study environmentally-friendly innovation, we focus on a process innovation, rather than on end-of-the-pipe solutions to pollution. Moreover, while previous studies emphasize the importance of regulation for inducing innovation, here we find substantial innovation occurring before regulations were in place. Instead, pressure from consumers to reduce the chlorine content of paper drives the first round of innovation. However, while some companies choose to adopt these technologies in response to consumer pressure, not all firms will differentiate their product in this way. Thus, governments need to regulate if their goal is broad diffusion of the environmental technology.

Contacts

David Popp
URL: http://cepa.maxwell.syr.edu/papers/174.html
Center for Environmental Policy and Administration
The Maxwell School, Syracuse University
Revised 11/05/2010 06:39:15